Ramp Metering

Main Page > Technical Documentation > Ramp Metering

​

Introduction ​ Ramp metering is used to control the flow of freeway on-ramp vehicles onto the mainline in an effort to prevent freeway flow breakdown, as well as improve the safety of merging operations. Determining effective ramp metering rates can be a complicated process because of the need to usually balance freeway, ramp, and arterial flows. Numerous ramp-metering algorithms have been developed. SwashSim currently implements the following algorithms:
 * Pretimed
 * Demand/Capacity
 * ALINEA
 * Fuzzy logic

Pretimed

Demand/Capacity

ALINEA ALINEA is a simple but effective ramp metering strategy that utilizes a local traffic-responsive feedback loop to maintain maximum throughput at the downstream merge area of an on-ramp. The ALINEA algorithm calculates the metering rate at each time step by computing the difference between the downstream desired occupancy and the aggregated downstream occupancy at each time step, multiplying that difference by a regulator parameter, and adding that result to the metering rate of the previous time step. The following equation implicitly calculates the metering rate:

$$ r(k) = r(k-1) + {K_{R}}\times \big(\hat{O}-{O_{Out}}(k)\big) $$

where

Detectors are placed on every freeway lane 500 m downstream of the acceleration lane. The detector data for each lane is aggregated together at each time step to calculate the occupancy value that is compared to the desired occupancy. The on-ramp contains two detectors: a presence detector directly behind the ramp meter signal controller and a passage detector immediately after the ramp meter signal controller. The presence detector ensures that the signal rests on red when no vehicles are detected and ensures that the ramp metering algorithm is being applied when a vehicle is detected. The passage detector ensures that the system does not break down in case vehicles stay queued up behind the signal controller. The figure below illustrates the ALINEA setup used in SwashSim.

The ALINEA flow chart below reads as follows:



where

Fuzzy Logic ​​ Another method through which ramp metering can be integrated into SwashSim is fuzzy logic. Fuzzy-logic algorithm was developed in response to the limitations of the Seattle bottleneck algorithm (i.e., it addresses the inherent issues with data accuracy and reliability in loop detectors, optimizes the mainline congestion and the ramp queues, does not require extensive system modeling, and is easy to tune using linguistic variables rather than numerical variables). This algorithm uses the mainline speed and occupancy and the ramp occupancy to calculate metering rates. This algorithm has nine rule groups including the upstream speed, upstream occupancy, upstream flow, downstream speed, downstream v/c, ramp demand occupancy, ramp queue occupancy the ramp occupancy, and ramp metering. Each rule group is associated with one or more of the six fuzzy classes including very low (VL), low (L), medium (M), high (H), and very high (VH). Ramp meters are calculated based on the rule weight and the degree of activation of each rule outcome. The location of each of the detectors are the same as the ones shown in ALINEA; however, there are additional detectors located upstream immediately at the end of the ramp. The figure below illustrates the Fuzzy Logic setup used in SwashSim.



The graphic below is an example of a typical fuzzy logic system. The following is a description of the major components of the fuzzy logic system:


 * Fuzzifier: The fuzzifier translates each input into a set of fuzzy variables via membership functions.
 * Rules: The rules are the set of regulations that are based on expert opinions.
 * Inference: The inference stage involves applying fuzzy operators and implication methods to the rule base, allowing the fuzzy inputs to be converted into one fuzzy output.
 * Defuzzifier: The defuzzifier produces a crisp output based upon the fuzzy output.



Fuzzy Sets The fuzzification process involves translating each input into a fuzzy set with understandable terms such as "low" and "high". This is done using membership functions, which are different for each input type. Upstream mainline inputs use the Gaussian function, downstream mainline and ramp inputs use the Sigmoid function, and the output uses the triangular function. The full list of inputs along with their specific fuzzy sets and membership functions is shown below.

Inputs (Aggregated Performance Measures)

Aggregated Upstream Mainline Occupancy Considering the aggregated upstream mainline occupancy varies from 0 to 20% and is described as 3 Gaussian fuzzy sets: Low, medium, and high. The overlap is 50% and the parameters (center point and the sigma value) are found below.



$$ Guassian(x;c,σ) = e^{-\frac{1}{2}(\frac{x-c}{σ})^{2}} $$

Aggregated Upstream Mainline Flow Considering the upstream mainline flow varies from 0 to 2,000 veh/h/ln and is described as 3 Gaussian fuzzy sets: Low, medium, and high. The overlap is 50% and the parameters (center point and the sigma value) are found below. $$ Guassian(x;c,σ) = e^{-\frac{1}{2}(\frac{x-c}{σ})^{2}} $$

Aggregated Upstream Mainline Average Speed Considering the aggregated upstream mainline average speed varies from 0 to 100 km/h and is described as 3 Gaussian fuzzy sets: Low, medium, and high. The overlap is 50% and the parameters (center point and the sigma value) are found using the plot shown below.



$$ Guassian(x;c,σ) = e^{-\frac{1}{2}(\frac{x-c}{σ})^{2}} $$

Aggregated Downstream Mainline Average Speed Aggregated downstream mainline average speed varies from 0 to 110 km/h. It is described as only 1 Sigmoid fuzzy set which is very low, and the parameters (center point and the sigma value) are found using the plot shown below.



$$ Sig(x;a,c) = \frac{1}{1+e^{-a(x-c)}} $$

Aggregated Downstream Mainline v/c Aggregated Downstream mainline v/c ratio varies from 0 to 1. It is described as only 1 Sigmoid fuzzy set which is very high, and the parameters (center point and the sigma value) are found using the plot shown below.



$$ Sig(x;a,c) = \frac{1}{1+e^{-a(x-c)}} $$

Aggregated Ramp Demand/Queue Occupancy Both the aggregated ramp demand and queue occupancy vary from 0 to 50% described as only 1 Sigmoid fuzzy set which is very high, and the parameters (center point and the sigma value) are found using the plot shown below.



$$ Sig(x;a,c) = \frac{1}{1+e^{-a(x-c)}} $$

Inference Fuzzy logic relationship will be defined as a list of if-then pairs between the inputs condition and the outputs responses. The input conditions is a "premise" and the out responses is a "consequent". For example, as shown in the diagram below, the Rule Condition starts with a If and the Rule Outcome starts with a then. Within the rule condition, there is a AND or OR operation. The AND operation is analogous to the intersection of fuzzy sets, which takes the minimum value of given degree of membership which is between 0-1. The OR operation is analogous to the union of fuzzy sets, which takes the maximum value of given degree of membership which is between 0-1.

Rules 1 to Rule 3 The purpose of rule 1 through rule 3 is to form a complete rule base, which means at least one of the rules would work since the whole occupancy range is covered. Rule 4 to Rule 7 The purpose of rule 4 to 7 is to couple speeds with either occupancy or flow to generate metering rates according to the fundamental diagram of traffic flow Rule 8 The purpose of rule 8 is to prevent the formation of downstream congestion. v/c-ratio calculated with the historical measured maximum flow rate of downstream can be seen as a prediction of the downstream bottleneck behavior. Rule 9 The purpose of rule 9 is to prevent the excessive queue formation and to avoid a spillback onto the arterial street road by applying the information collected from queue detector. Rule weights The rule weight is to stress the priority of each rule. Rule weighting scheme is flexible for different applications.

Output (Ramp Metering)

The metering rate varies from 240 veh/h to 900 veh/h, and is described as 3 triangular fuzzy sets: Low, medium, and high. The overlap is 50%.



$$ Triangle(x;a,b,c)=\left\{\begin{array}{l} 0,&\mbox{𝑥 ≤ 𝑎 }\\ \frac{x-a}{b-a},&\mbox{𝑎 ≤ 𝑥 ≤ b}\\ \frac{c-x}{c-b},&\mbox{𝑏 ≤ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑐}\\ 0,&\mbox{𝑥 ≥ 𝑐} \end{array}\right. $$

Defuzzification The defuzzication process is to convert a fuzzy output variable into a crisp value (metering rate). The centroid method is commonly used for the defuzzification process. In practice, a discrete fuzzy centroid equation is used to replace the continuous centroid equation since it is easier to calculate. The equation is shown below.

$$ Metering Rate = \frac{\sum^3_{i=1}{w_{i}}{c_{i}}{I_{i}}}{\sum^3_{i=1}{w_{i}}{c_{i}}} $$

where

The indices from the rule outcome refers to the rule # mentioned under inference. $$w(Low) = RuleOutcome[3] \times 2 + RuleOutcome[4] \times 2 + RuleOutcome[8] \times 3 $$ $$w(Medium) = RuleOutcome[2] \times 1.5 + RuleOutcome[5] \times 1 $$ $$w(High) = RuleOutcome[1] \times 21.5 + RuleOutcome[6] \times 1 + RuleOutcome[7] \times 1 + RuleOutcome[9] \times 3 $$ $$c(Low) = \frac{c-b}{3} + a $$ $$c(Medium) = b $$ $$c(High) = c - \frac{b-a}{3} $$ $$I(Low) = 165 $$ $$I(Medium) = 330 $$ $$I(High) = 165 $$

Demand/Capacity ​ This algorithm requires the detectors to be located on freeway mainline immediately upstream of merge point and on freeway mainline 500 m downstream of merge point. Based on this algorithm, if the aggregated occupancy on the freeway downstream detector is above the critical occupancy, it hits the minimum metering rate, otherwise the metering rate is set as the difference between the capacity at downstream detector and aggregated flow rate at upstream detector. The demand/capacity algorithm used to calculate the metering rate sufficient for the given conditions on the freeway follows the logic as of following:



where

Test Networks ​ Two test networks were created in SwashSim to compare the ramp metering capabilities of ALINEA and fuzzy logic: a diamond interchange and a cloverleaf (or loop) interchange. These interchanges were selected due to their common appearance in states that utilize ramp metering such as Florida. General schematics of both test networks are shown below. The main purpose of the diamond interchange with regards to ramp metering is to examine the relationship between the freeway mainline and the ramp. In contrast, the purpose of the loop interchange is to examine the relationship between the freeway mainline, the ramp, and the arterial that the ramp extends from.

Diamond Interchange Loop Interchange

Limitations ​
 * Not able to coordinate ramp meters with arterial signals

References ​